some_stars: (harriet jones fangirl)
fifty frenchmen can't be wrong ([personal profile] some_stars) wrote2011-06-28 03:49 pm

that awkward moment

...when you're typing up some cover copy from the back of your Oxford World's Classics edition of a book, and you realize that said copy doesn't use the Oxford comma.

Of course, I know there's no actual reason it should (aside from being CORRECT AND TRUE I mean)--in fact the official Oxford style guide is against it, and I'm pretty sure normal people just call it a serial comma these days--but it really tilted my brain for a second.
giandujakiss: (Default)

[personal profile] giandujakiss 2011-06-28 09:35 pm (UTC)(link)
I am so disappointed in the Oxford style guide! I am passionately, perhaps irrationally, committed to the Oxford comma.
giandujakiss: (Default)

[personal profile] giandujakiss 2011-06-28 09:59 pm (UTC)(link)
The intensity of my feelings on this matter is the part where it gets irrational.

I hate their rule so much - they basically say, "don't use it, unless it would be confusing not to use it." As a matter of aesthetics, I hate the asymmetry of such a rule; as a matter of practicality, I hate that it requires the writer to gauge whether the sentence is confusing. If they thought it was confusing without the comma, no one would ever write a confusing sentence. BUT THEY DO.. Which means most writers are not good judges of when the lack of a comma renders a sentence confusing.

*annoyed*
weaver: (Default)

[personal profile] weaver 2011-06-29 03:48 am (UTC)(link)
I will forever champion the Oxford comma. EVEN IF OXFORD WON'T.

I JUST LOVE IT OKAY.