fifty frenchmen can't be wrong (
some_stars) wrote2011-06-28 03:49 pm
that awkward moment
...when you're typing up some cover copy from the back of your Oxford World's Classics edition of a book, and you realize that said copy doesn't use the Oxford comma.
Of course, I know there's no actual reason it should (aside from being CORRECT AND TRUE I mean)--in fact the official Oxford style guide is against it, and I'm pretty sure normal people just call it a serial comma these days--but it really tilted my brain for a second.
Of course, I know there's no actual reason it should (aside from being CORRECT AND TRUE I mean)--in fact the official Oxford style guide is against it, and I'm pretty sure normal people just call it a serial comma these days--but it really tilted my brain for a second.

no subject
no subject
no subject
I hate their rule so much - they basically say, "don't use it, unless it would be confusing not to use it." As a matter of aesthetics, I hate the asymmetry of such a rule; as a matter of practicality, I hate that it requires the writer to gauge whether the sentence is confusing. If they thought it was confusing without the comma, no one would ever write a confusing sentence. BUT THEY DO.. Which means most writers are not good judges of when the lack of a comma renders a sentence confusing.
*annoyed*
no subject
no subject
I JUST LOVE IT OKAY.
no subject
no subject